Henry is a landlord renting an apartment to Steven, a student at a nearby university. The two enter into a one-year lease arrangement. Steven vacates the apartment after six months, notifying Henry that he has vacated and intends to pay no further rent. Henry makes no attempt to rent the apartment during the next six month period and sues Steven for the full amount of the lease contract at year end. Henry's damages will likely be reduced because he failed to .

Mitigate his damages

Explanation:

By law, mitigation involves making effort to reduce losses. Now, an individual claiming damages or losses due to break in contract or a wrongful act by another individual has a duty under the law to mitigate those damages. That is to say, the plantiff is under a duty under the law to reduce the loss by taking advantage of any opportunity arising that may help.redice the losses or damages. However, in this case, the plantiff, who's the landlord Henry did not mitigate the loss by not attempting to or renting the accommodation out for the remaining six month. Thus, the damages would likely be reduced because he failed to mitigate his damages as he should have done as required under the law.

being born in poverty would limit the people's chances, opportunities and benefits.

this happen because of several things, such as:

- poor people tend to gain less access to good education and nutrition. this mean that their chance to obtain high paying jobs would also be limited.

- poor people tend to socialize with other poor people while the rich tend to socialize with other rich people. this means that simply throguh their social circle, rich people would have more business opportunities compared to the poor people.

- rich people tend to have more capital in their disposal. this would benefit them in business since it is far easier for them to fund their business operation compared to poor people.

b.

c.

d.

g.

those r all of them i believe