subject
Business, 22.04.2020 05:00 winterblanco

In 2013, Jack and Shirley Wright moved from Riverside, in Southern California, up to Santa Clara, in Northern California, when Jack's company opened a new branch office there. They decided to rent for a while so they could get to know the area before buying a home. Three weeks ago, they finally found and put a contract on a lovely 3-bedroom ranch, and the sellers accepted the first offer. They took that as a good sign, but now it's only 5 days until the close of escrow and they still haven't signed the escrow papers yet. In fact, they aren't due to sign the escrow papers until the day before the actual close of escrow. The Wrights are under the impression that something is wrong, because when they sold their last home, the escrow instructions had to be signed by both parties to the transaction immediately after they all signed the purchase agreement--about 60 days ahead of the actual close of escrow date. Which of the following is true of this situation?1. Their current agent has violated his fiduciary duties to them because he is mishandling their finances, and putting off handling the escrow until the last minute, thereby risking their new home and monies.2. Their agent in Riverside was simply being cautious by handling the escrow so early in the game, because in California, escrow signing generally takes place in the last 2 weeks prior to the actual close of escrow.3. The escrow practices in Southern California differ from those in Northern California. In Southern California, the escrow instructions are signed by the buyer and seller shortly after theyâve signed the purchase agreement, just after the start of escrow, which is about 60 days prior to the actual close of escrow. In Northern California, the escrow instructions are usually not signed until one or two days just before the close of escrow.4. As of December 2014, the escrow practices have been changed from what they were in 2013 (when the Wrights sold their previous home), to stipulate that the escrow signing date and location are to be determined by both the buyer and the seller, as well as to the broker who is in charge of handling the escrow proceedings. Therefore, there is no specific regulation that sets forth the date or time for such proceedings. However, their agent was negligent in not explaining this to them, as well as not asking for their input into the signing date.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 21:00
Captain john's yachts, inc., located in fort lauderdale, florida, rents three types of ocean-going boats: sailboats, cabin cruisers, and captain john's favorite, the luxury yachts. captain john advertises his boats with his famous "you rent"we pilot" slogan, which means that the company supplies the captain and crew for each rented boat. each rented boat has one captain, of course, but the crew sizes (deck hands, galley hands, etc.) differ. the crew requirements, in addition to a captain, are one for sailboats, two for cabin cruisers, and three for yachts. ten employees are captains, and an additional 18 employees fill the various crew positions. currently, captain john has rental requests for all his boats: four sailboats, eight cabin cruisers, and three luxury yachts. if captain john's daily profit contribution is $50 for sailboats, $70 for cruisers, and $100 for luxury yachts, how many boats of each type should he rent?
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 11:10
The green fiddle has declared a $5 per share dividend. suppose capital gains are not taxed, but dividends are taxed at 15 percent. new irs regulations require that taxes be withheld at the time the dividend is paid. green fiddle stock sells for $71.50 per share, and the stock is about to go ex-dividend. what will the ex-dividend price be?
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 12:10
Compute the cost of not taking the following cash discounts. (use a 360-day year. do not round intermediate calculations. input your final answers as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places.)
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 19:00
Which of the following is likely not a benefit of requiring a grand jury to listen to and examine all of the evidence against a person suspected of committing a serious crime and then independently deciding whether or not to hand down an indictment? 1.the grand jury system provides the accused another safeguard against being sent to trial and facing conviction based on flawed evidence. 2.the members of the grand jury are drawn from the community and are empowered to render independent decisions about whether or not the government has collected enough evidence to bring an individual to trial. 3.the grand jury’s decision can provide prosecutors insight into what is necessary to build a sufficient case if a similar crime is presented later. 4.the grand jury is impaneled to rubber-stamp prosecutors’ cases, which makes it possible for more cases to reach trial.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
In 2013, Jack and Shirley Wright moved from Riverside, in Southern California, up to Santa Clara, in...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 30.11.2021 21:30
question
Engineering, 30.11.2021 21:30