Andrew agrees to paint Rosalene's house for $500. Two days after he starts the job, he decides that $500 isn't enough money. He refuses to finish the job, unless Rosalene agrees to pay him $100 more. What legal principle applies to this fact situation?
A. The acceptance of additional money to settle a disputed claim is supported by consideration.
B. A past obligation is sufficient consideration for a new promise.
C. Andrew was already obligated to paint the house. He gives no additional consideration in return for Rosalene's promise to pay more money.
D. Rosalene has made a promise in exchange for a forbearance.

C. Andrew was already obligated to paint the house. He gives no additional consideration in return for Rosalene's promise to pay more money.

Explanation:

In this scenario Andrew had already agreed to do the painting for $500, so he is obligated to do the job or breach the contract.

He does not have a legal backing to make a counter deal in the middle of the job.

If Roseline decides to pay an extra $100 she does so without any obligations. She may or may not pay and Andrew is still obligated to complete the work.

net worth is the difference between what you own and what you have. if you exceed your liabilities you have a positive net worth. if your liabilities are greater than your assets you have a negative net worth. its a snapshot of your financial situation. if you calculate your net worth you will see the end result of everything you've earned and spent as of now. net worth statements and all you asked of can you determine where you are, how to get where you want to be, if your spending   to much. honestly it can tell you a lot of things. i can go on, but you can paint the picture from here.

explanation:

answer/// randomly assign the participants to the   conditions