Suppose now (and note that this is very often the case in valuing benefits and costs of pollution and pollution abatement) that the government pollution control agency only was able to (accurately) evaluate a policy of getting X=3. The government is now considering whether to require policies leading to X=3 or remain at the status quo X=0 level. Assume that true benefits and costs are represented by (as in 3.1): LaTeX: B\left(X\right)\:=\:60X-3X^2B ( X ) = 60 X − 3 X 2 for benefits and LaTeX: C\left(X\right)=10X+2X^2C ( X ) = 10 X + 2 X 2 for costs. Based on this limited information, what should the government do? Does a policy that gets to X=3 improve net social benefit relative to the status quo of X=0? Is it efficient? Group of answer choices

The federal reserve's organization while all members of the federal reserve board of governors vote at federal open market committee (fomc) meetings, only of the regional bank presidents are members of the fomc. the federal reserve's role as a lender of last resort involves lending to which of the following financially troubled institutions? u.s. banks that cannot borrow elsewhere governments in developing countries during currency crises u.s. state governments when they run short on tax revenues the federal reserve's primary tool for changing the money supply is . in order to decrease the number of dollars in the u.s. economy (the money supply), the federal reserve will government bonds.

The following accounts are denominated in pesos as of december 31, 2015. for reporting purposes, these amounts need to be stated in u.s. dollars. for each balance, indicate the exchange rate that would be used if a translation is made under the current rate method. then, again for each account, provide the exchange rate that would be necessary if a remeasurement is being made using the temporal method. the company was started in 2000. the buildings were acquired in 2002 and the patents in 2003. (round your answers to 2 decimal places.) exchange rates for 1 peso are as follows: 2000 1 peso = $ 0.28 2002 1 = 0.26 2003 1 = 0.25 january 1, 2015 1 = 0.24 april 1, 2015 1 = 0.23 july 1, 2015 1 = 0.22 october 1, 2015 1 = 0.20 december 31, 2015 1 = 0.16 average for 2015 1 = 0.19

mark, a civil engineer, entered into a contract with david. as per the contract, mark agreed to design and build a house for david for a specified fee. mark provided david with an estimation of the total cost and the contract was mutually agreed upon. however, during construction, when mark increased the price due to a miscalculation on his part, david refused to pay the amount. this scenario is an example of a mistake.