In discussions of business and society, why is there a tendency to focus on large-sized rather than small- or medium sized firms? Have the corporate ethics scandals of the past decade affected small- and medium-sized firms? If so, in what ways have these firms been affected?

In the 2000's the Enron outrage and different organizations have been in the news in light of their moral infringement. These organizations are settled and have exceptional yields on venture.  

Huge companies are focused as their business runs with high benefits, and makes foundations admired to reprimand when they act deceptive. Interestingly with the legislature that isn't looking for benefits yet is accused of acting in the open intrigue. Little or medium estimated firms, have the points of interest to be inconspicuous in dishonest cases on the grounds that their piece of the overall industry is little.  

Henceforth, huge firms are centered instead of little or medium measured firms.

start by isolating the variable on one side by adding 43w^2 to both sides.   the equation will read:

25w^2+5=0

*subtract 5 from both sides*

25w^2=-5

*divide both sides by 25*

w^2=-1/5

*take the square root of both sides*

w=√(-1/5)

the square root of -1 is i.   the square root of 5 remains √5

the answer is i/√5.

hope this

being born in poverty would limit the people's chances, opportunities and benefits.

this happen because of several things, such as:

- poor people tend to gain less access to good education and nutrition. this mean that their chance to obtain high paying jobs would also be limited.

- poor people tend to socialize with other poor people while the rich tend to socialize with other rich people. this means that simply throguh their social circle, rich people would have more business opportunities compared to the poor people.

- rich people tend to have more capital in their disposal. this would benefit them in business since it is far easier for them to fund their business operation compared to poor people.