subject
Business, 15.04.2020 16:16 azaz1819

Morten Co., which uses the double-declining-balance method of depreciation, purchased a new machine on January 1, 2018. The machine cost $160,000, had an estimated useful life of 8 years and $20,000 residual value at the end of its useful life What is the depreciation expense for 2018?

a. $40,000
b. $10,000
c. $30,000
d. $20,000

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 06:00
Suppose that a monopolistically competitive restaurant is currently serving 260 meals per day (the output where mr
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 19:10
Do it! review 16-3 the assembly department for right pens has the following production data for the current month. beginning work in process units transferred out ending work in process 0 22,500 16,000 materials are entered at the beginning of the process. the ending work in process units are 70% complete as to conversion costs. compute the equivalent units of production for (a) materials and (b) conversion costs. materials conversion costs the equivalent units of production
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 19:30
When it is 4: 00 a.m. in halifax, it is 1: 00 p.m. in karachi, and when it is 9: 00 a.m. in karachi, it is 5: 00 a.m. in warsaw. mary left halifax to fly to karachi, but she accidentally left her watch on warsaw time. according to mary’s watch, she left halifax at 9: 40 p.m. on monday. the local time when she arrived at karachi was 3: 00 p.m. tuesday. how long was mary’s flight? a. 9 hours, 20 minutes b. 13 hours, 20 minutes c. 14 hours, 20 minutes d. 17 hours, 20 minutes
Answers: 1
question
Business, 23.06.2019 17:30
Why is the cournot equilibrium an​ equilibrium? a. there are​ short-run barriers to exit in a cournot​ duopoly, so both firms cannot alter their output levels. b. given the other​ firm's level of​ production, both firms are maximizing profits and cannot improve their situation by unilaterally altering their level of output. c. both firms operate at zero profit under a cournot​ equilibrium, so they would face negative profits if they change output. d. both firms operate at minimum​ long-run average cost under a cournot​ equilibrium, so changes to output would reduce​ long-run profits. even if they​ can't collude, why​ don't firms set their outputs at the joint​ profit-maximizing levels​ (i.e., the levels they would have chosen had they​ colluded)? a. given that other firm produces at the collusive​ level, a firm could increase their own profits by increasing output above the collusive level. b. the midpoint of the collusion curve​ (i.e., the collusive​ outcome) lies below the reaction​ curves, so both firms have an incentive to increase output under the cournot duopoly. c. both a and b are correct d. both a and b are incorrect
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Morten Co., which uses the double-declining-balance method of depreciation, purchased a new machine...
Questions
question
Biology, 26.11.2020 20:50