A firm sells 10,000 units of X per month at the market price of $10. There are many other firms in this industry producing the same variety of X. With all firms producing an identical product, each firm is a price taker in this market. Farah Mahmood and her friend Daniela Rodriguez, both students of economics, are debating the impact of a recent increase in the demand for X. Farah feels that the demand faced by each firm will shift to the right. This in turn will increase the market price. Daniela meanwhile is not sure how much the price will rise because she thinks that the immediate response to the higher demand will be a rightward shift in each firm's supply curve.
Farah's claim that each firm's demand curve will shift right is flawed because:.
A. she is ignoring the impact of the increased demand on producer surplus.
B. she is confusing the demand curve faced by the firm with the market demand curve.
C. she is assuming that the market demand curve is not linear.
D. she is assuming that the law of supply does not hold for X.
E. she is confusing supply and quantity supplied

This problem has been solved! see the answercompute and interpret altman's z-scoresfollowing is selected financial information for ebay, for its fiscal years 2005 and 2006.(in millions, except per share data) 2006 2005current assets $ 4,970.59 $ 3,183.24current liabilities 2,518.39 1,484.93total assets 13,494.01 11,788.99total liabilities 2,589.38 1,741.00shares outstanding 1,368.51 1,404.18retained earnings 4,538.35 2,819.64stock price per share 30.07 43.22sales 5,969.74 4,552.40earnings before interest and taxes 1,439.77 1,445.18compute and interpret altman z-scores for the company for both years. (do not round until your final answer; then round your answers to two decimal places.)2006 z-score = answer2005 z-score = answerwhich of the following best describes the company's likelihood to go bankrupt given the z-score in 2006 compared to 2007.the z-score in 2006 is half of the 2005 score. both z-scores are well above the score that represents a healthy company.the z-score in 2006 is double the 2005 score. the z-score has increased sharply, which suggests the company has greatly increased the risk of bankruptcy.the z-score in 2006 is half of the 2005 score. the z-score has decreased sharply, which suggests the company is in financial distress.the z-score in 2006 is double the 2005 score. the z-score has increased sharply, which suggests the company has greatly lowered the risk of bankruptcy.