subject
Business, 26.03.2020 23:41 dsbdkbv2772

1. In the case, the court focused on the language of the contract. In the contract, the Desses agreed to fully disclose all information about the property. Further, under the terms of the contract, it was agreed that Sirva and "other prospective buyers" could rely on the Desses’ disclosures. Would the Desses have had a stronger case if the contract was silent as to which parties could rely on the Desses’ disclosures?

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 20:30
What is the difference between a public and a private corporation?
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 02:40
Which critical success factor improves with reduced cycle time, better quality standards, and improved efficiency when an is is implemented?
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 11:40
Vendors provide restaurants with what? o a. cooked items ob. raw materials oc. furniture od. menu recipes
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 20:40
On january 1, 2017, pharoah company issued 10-year, $2,020,000 face value, 6% bonds, at par. each $1,000 bond is convertible into 16 shares of pharoah common stock. pharoah’s net income in 2017 was $317,000, and its tax rate was 40%. the company had 97,000 shares of common stock outstanding throughout 2017. none of the bonds were converted in 2017. (a) compute diluted earnings per share for 2017. (round answer to 2 decimal places, e.g. $2.55.) diluted earnings per share
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
1. In the case, the court focused on the language of the contract. In the contract, the Desses agree...
Questions