As a PR practitioner, imagine you work for a large corporation that has recently launched a new product that has not lived up to company – or customer – expectations. Slow product sales will now require the layoff of a few hundred employees. Company leaders are coming to you for advice. They want to evade responsibility by telling customers “they meant well,” but aren’t culpable for the new product’s flaws. They also want to keep pending layoffs a secret until the very last minute. What do you do? As the organization’s ethical compass, what counsel and direction would you give to senior leaders? If you were tasked with writing an official statement addressing the subpar quality of the product and the subsequent layoffs, what would you say?

Oakmont company has an opportunity to manufacture and sell a new product for a four-year period. the company’s discount rate is 18%. after careful study, oakmont estimated the following costs and revenues for the new product: cost of equipment needed $ 230,000 working capital needed $ 84,000 overhaul of the equipment in year two $ 9,000 salvage value of the equipment in four years $ 12,000 annual revenues and costs: sales revenues $ 400,000 variable expenses $ 195,000 fixed out-of-pocket operating costs $ 85,000 when the project concludes in four years the working capital will be released for investment elsewhere within the company. click here to view exhibit 12b-1 and exhibit 12b-2, to determine the appropriate discount factor(s) using tables.

Myflvs -question 3 multiple choice worth 2 points)(10.04 hc)in panama city in january, high tide was at midnight. the water level at high tide was 9 feet and1 foot at low tide. assuming the next high tide is exactly 12 hours later and that the height of thewater can be modeled by a cosine curve, find an equation for water level in january for panamacity as a function of time (t).of(t) = 4 + 5of(t) = 5 cost + 4o 460) = 5 cos 1+ 4of(0) = 4 cos + 5

Serious question, which is preferred in a business? pp or poopoo?