subject
Business, 19.03.2020 01:35 joserodriguez212004

Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods:

1. The government sets pollution standards using the regulation.
2. The government allocates tradable pollution permits.

Each firm faces different costs, so reducing pollution is more difficult for some firms than others. The following table shows the cost each firm faces to eliminate each unit of pollution. For each firm, assume that the cost of reducing pollution to zero (that is, eliminating all 4 units of pollution) is prohibitively expensive.

Cost of Eliminating the...
First Unit of Pollution Second Unit of Pollution Third Unit of Pollution
Firm (Dollars) (Dollars) (Dollars)
Firm X 80 100 150
Firm Y 450 800 1,050
Firm Z 95 120 200

Now, imagine that two government employees proposed alternative plans for reducing pollution by 6 units.
Method 1: Regulation
The first government employee suggests limiting pollution through regulation. To meet the pollution goal, the government requires each firm to reduce its pollution by 2 units.
Complete the following table with the total cost to each firm of reducing its pollution by 2 units.

Firm Total Cost of Eliminating Two Units of Pollution
(Dollars)
Firm X ?
Firm Y ?
Firm Z ?

Meanwhile, the other employee proposes using a different strategy to achieve the government's goal of reducing pollution in the area from 12 units to 6 units. This employee suggests that the government issue two pollution permits to each firm. For each permit a firm has in its possession, it can emit 1 unit of pollution. Firms are free to trade pollution permits with one another (that is, buy and sell them) as long as both firms can agree on a price. For example, if firm X agrees to sell a permit to firm Y at an agreed-upon price, then firm Y would end up with three permits and would need to reduce its pollution by only 1 unit while firm X would end up with only one permit and would have to reduce its pollution by 3 units. Assume the negotiation and exchange of permits are costless.

Because firm Y has high pollution-reduction costs, it thinks it might be better off buying a permit from firm X and a permit from firm Z so that it doesn't have to reduce its own pollution emissions.
At which of the following prices are both firm X and firm Z willing to sell one of their permits to firm Y? Check all that apply.

a) $102 b) $164 c) $179 d) $410 e) $708

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 14:30
At which level will a manager use analytics to make decisions? operational level managerial level strategic level all of the above
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 10:00
University car wash built a deluxe car wash across the street from campus. the new machines cost $219,000 including installation. the company estimates that the equipment will have a residual value of $19,500. university car wash also estimates it will use the machine for six years or about 12,500 total hours. actual use per year was as follows: year hours used 1 3,100 2 1,100 3 1,200 4 2,800 5 2,600 6 1,200 prepare a depreciation schedule for six years using the following methods: 1. straight-line. 2. double-declining-balance. 3. activity-based.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 22:00
Suppose that with a budget of $110, deborah spends $66 on sushi and $44 on bagels when sushi costs $2 per piece and bagels cost $2 per bagel. but then, the price of bagels falls to $1 per bagel.
Answers: 3
question
Business, 23.06.2019 00:50
Exercise 12-7 shown below are comparative balance sheets for flint corporation. flint corporation comparative balance sheets december 31 assets 2017 2016 cash $ 201,348 $ 65,142 accounts receivable 260,568 225,036 inventory 494,487 559,629 land 236,880 296,100 equipment 769,860 592,200 accumulated depreciation—equipment (195,426 ) (94,752 ) total $1,767,717 $1,643,355 liabilities and stockholders’ equity accounts payable $ 115,479 $ 127,323 bonds payable 444,150 592,200 common stock ($1 par) 639,576 515,214 retained earnings 568,512 408,618 total $1,767,717 $1,643,355 additional information: 1. net income for 2017 was $275,373. 2. depreciation expense was $100,674. 3. cash dividends of $115,479 were declared and paid. 4. bonds payable amounting to $148,050 were redeemed for cash $148,050. 5. common stock was issued for $124,362 cash. 6. no equipment was sold during 2017. 7. land was sold for its book value. prepare a statement of cash flows for 2017 using the indirect method.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently,...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 03.05.2021 19:30
question
Mathematics, 03.05.2021 19:30
question
History, 03.05.2021 19:30
question
Mathematics, 03.05.2021 19:30
question
Mathematics, 03.05.2021 19:30