According to the box, "Will Strategy Robots Replace Managers?", with robots having the capabilities to do a multitude of business tasks, why have machines not replaced most human jobs?

The options for this question are the following:

A. Companies do not want to eliminate all jobs at once.

B. Machines cannot do the jobs of humans, like recommend cancer cures or make banking decisions.

C.  There is a level of reasoning and strategy that only humans have the ability to do.

D. Machines are only useful in manufacturing duties.

The correct answer is C. There is a level of reasoning and strategy that only humans have the ability to do.

Explanation:

There are two variables that limit machines. One is the excessive consumption of energy that some devices require to carry out their activities.

For example, some prototypes that simulate some everyday human tasks, such as walking or doing housework, typically have a battery life of 15-20 minutes.

The second has to do with the costs of incorporating high-end computers that allow robots to recognize spaces and make decisions on the go.

“For a human being it is easy to identify if he is in a room, a room or a hall. Robots need cameras and computers to process that information, "adds Ramírez.

To understand that point, a relationship must be established: a home computer has four cores to process information. However, artifacts of up to 50 cores are needed to perform these space recognition operations in a timely manner, which would increase the cost of robot production.

jchcghfjvhvhhjhj

answer; lags, push the econ below the natural level of output;