Business, 05.03.2020 20:42 brianna4357

Suppose the total benefit derived from a given decision, Q, is B(Q) 25Q Q2 and the corresponding total cost is C(Q) 5 Q2 , so that MB(Q) 25 2Q and MC(Q) 2Q. a. What is total benefit when Q 2? Q 10? b. What is marginal benefit when Q 2? Q 10? c. What level of Q maximizes total benefit? d. What is total cost when Q 2? Q 10? e. What is marginal cost when Q 2? Q 10? f. What level of Q minimizes total cost? g. What level of Q maximizes net benefits?

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 22.06.2019 08:00

Who is not spending wisely? erika goes shopping and saves her receipts. she totals how much she spent and writes it down. mia needs to buy a new pair of shoes because she joined the soccer team. she looks at newspaper ads to find the best price. lauren has been thinking about getting a puppy for a long time. she walks by the pet store at the mall and decides to get a puppy. erin makes a purchase online using a credit card. she knows that she can pay the entire bill when it arrives.

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 16:50

Coop inc. owns 40% of chicken inc., both coop and chicken are corporations. chicken pays coop a dividend of $10,000 in the current year. chicken also reports financial accounting earnings of $20,000 for that year. assume coop follows the general rule of accounting for investment in chicken. what is the amount and nature of the book-tax difference to coop associated with the dividend distribution (ignoring the dividends received deduction)?

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 20:30

Considered alone, which of the following would increase a company's current ratio? a. an increase in net fixed assets.b. an increase in accrued liabilities.c. an increase in notes payable.d. an increase in accounts receivable.e. an increase in accounts payable.

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 21:50

scenario: hawaii and south carolina are trading partners. hawaii has an absolute advantage in the production of both coffee and tea. the opportunity cost of producing 1 pound of tea in hawaii is 2 pounds of coffee, and the opportunity cost of producing 1 pound of tea in south carolina is 1/3 pound of coffee. which of the following statements is true? a. south carolina should specialize in the production of both tea and coffee. b. hawaii should specialize in the production of tea, whereas south carolina should specialize in the production of coffee. c. hawaii should specialize in the production of coffee, whereas south carolina should specialize in the production of tea. d. hawaii should specialize in the production of both tea and coffee.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Suppose the total benefit derived from a given decision, Q, is B(Q) 25Q Q2 and the corresponding tot...

Questions