subject
Business, 19.02.2020 03:20 debrielcalderon

Consider a corrupt provincial government in which each housing inspector examines two newly built structures each week. All the builders in the province are unethical and want to increase their profits by using substandard construction materials, but they canât do that unless they can bribe a housing inspector into approving a substandard construction materials, but they canât do that unless they can bride a housing inspector into approving a substandard building. a) If bribes cost $1,000 each, how much will a housing inspector make each year in bribes? b) There is a provincial construction supervisor who gets to hire all of the housing inspectors. c) Corrupt officials may have an incentive to reduce the provision of government services to help line their own pockets. d) What if reducing the number of inspectors from 20 to 10 only increased the equilibrium bribe from $1,000 to $1,500?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 14:30
When marietta chooses to only purchase a combination of goods that lie within her budget line, she: is decreasing utility. is maximizing utility. likely has negative savings. must reduce the quantity?
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 05:50
Which is one solution to levy the complexity of the global matrix strategy with added customer-focused dimensions?
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 16:50
According to ceo heidi ganahl, camp bow wow requires a strong and consistent corporate culture to keep all local franchise owners "on the same page" and to follow a common template for the business and brand. this culture could become detrimental over time because: (a) strong consistent cultures are inflexible and incapable of adapting to environmental change (b) strong consistent cultures are too flexible and capable of adapting to environmental change (c) strong consistent cultures don’t perform well in any environment (d) the passing of time provides stability and predictability for businesses
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 21:50
The third program provides families with $50 in food stamps each week, redeemable for both perishable and nonperishable food. the fourth policy instead provides a family with a box of nonperishable foods each week, worth $50. use two graphs to illustrate that a family may be indifferent between the two programs, but will never prefer the $50 box of nonperishable foods over the $50 in food stamps. state your answer and use a consumer choice model for perishable food and nonperishable food to graphically justify your choice.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Consider a corrupt provincial government in which each housing inspector examines two newly built st...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 23.07.2019 01:30