When she was in college, Jammie Thomas-Rasset wrote a case study on Napster, the online peer-to-peer (P2P) file-sharing network, and knew that it was shut down because it was illegal. Several years later, Capitol Records, Inc., which owns the copyrights to a large number of music recordings, discovered that "tereastarr", a user name associated with Thomas-Rasset’s Internet protocol address, had made twenty-four songs available for distribution on KaZaA, another P2P network. Capitol notified Thomas-Rasset that she had been identified as engaging in the unauthorized trading of music. She replaced the hard drive on her computer with a new drive that did not contain the songs in dispute. Is Thomas-Rasset liable for copyright infringement? 1. What action did Thomas-Rasset have to take in order to share twenty-four copyrighted songs available for distribution on KaZaA?