You are going to value Lauryn’s Doll Co. using the FCF model. After consulting various sources, you find that Lauryn's has a reported equity beta of 1.4, a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.4, and a tax rate of 40 percent. Assume a risk-free rate of 4 percent and a market risk premium of 8 percent. Lauryn’s Doll Co. had EBIT last year of $41 million, which is net of a depreciation expense of $4.1 million. In addition, Lauryn's made $4 million in capital expenditures and increased net working capital by $2.0 million. Assume the FCF is expected to grow at a rate of 2 percent into perpetuity. What is the value of the firm? (Do not round intermediate calculations. Enter your answer in millions rounded to 2 decimal places.)

Ida sidha karya company is a family-owned company located on the island of bali in indonesia. the company produces a handcrafted balinese musical instrument called a gamelan that is similar to a xylophone. the gamelans are sold for $860. selected data for the company’s operations last year follow: units in beginning inventory 0 units produced 320 units sold 285 units in ending inventory 35 variable costs per unit: direct materials $ 135 direct labor $ 355 variable manufacturing overhead $ 30 variable selling and administrative $ 15 fixed costs: fixed manufacturing overhead $ 64,000 fixed selling and administrative $ 27,000 the absorption costing income statement prepared by the company’s accountant for last year appears below: sales $ 245,100 cost of goods sold 205,200 gross margin 39,900 selling and administrative expense 31,275 net operating income $ 8,625 required: 1. under absorption costing, how much fixed manufacturing overhead cost is included in the company's inventory at the end of last year? 2. prepare an income statement for last year using variable costing. what is the amount of the difference in net operating income between the two costing methods?

The dollar value generated over decades of customer loyalty to your company is known as brand equity. viability. sustainability. luck.

Which is one solution to levy the complexity of the global matrix strategy with added customer-focused dimensions?