In response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, airline security screening increased dramatically. As a result, the travel time of airline passengers has increased substantially. Would it make economic sense to devote enough resources to completely prevent any such future attacks? Why or why not?

Answer and explanation:

The 9/11 attack is possibly one of the most horrible events in American History. Terrorists from armed-group Al Qaeda infiltrated as passengers of American Airlines, took control of the plane threatening people with fire guns, and eventually crashed the plane into the World Trade Center in Manhattan, New York City (2001).

From the economic point of view, it would reasonable if airlines increase investment in technology and resources that allow them to improve their screening process to avoid such moments to be repeated in the future. Eventually, the costs of not conducting a proper passenger screening could be higher, not only economically speaking.

answer; (c) canada,mexico and the united states. i do believe this is the correct answer; /// good luck

the answer is "b.the increased supply will create a surplus. "

the essential thought behind price controls is straightforward - utilize the power of law to modify the equilibrium of a market. for instance, the legislature may choose that the steel business needs to survive, and in this way pass a law to set a value floor on steel. this implies all steel sold must offer at or over the floor value, which must be set over the equilibrium cost for it to have any impact. the switch could likewise happen - the administration can choose that steel is excessively costly and set a value roof underneath its equilibrium value, with the goal that all steel must be sold at or beneath that ceiling.