John, Lesa, and Tabir form a limited liability company. John contributes 60 percent of the capital, and Lesa and Tabir each contribute 20 percent. Nothing is decided about how profits will be divided. John assumes that he will be entitled to 60 percent of the profits, in accordance with his contribution. Lesa and Tabir, however, assume that the profits will be divided equally. A dispute over the profits arises, and ultimately a court has to decide the issue. What law will the court apply? In most states, what will result? How could this dispute have been avoided in the first place? Discuss fully.

Limited liability companies are creatures of

1.state constitutions.

2.statute.

3.case law.

4.secondary sources

2.statute.

Explanation:

The court ruling will be decided by the contractual agreement signed by the three parties. A Limited Liability Agreement will usually be demonstrated by three parties signing a contract together.

The situation will become difficult once, within each partner, there is no written statement about the distribution of profit. Every partner must obtain the suitable yield rate, based on their original investment.

The verdict begins to appear as if it falls into the hands of the state. By considering the Revised Uniform Partnership Act-Section 306. It relies heavily on where the business is registered, authorized, type of business.

However, John is the majority shareholder with 60 per cent of financial and legal accountability[ which is why he owes more to investment return]. It is also partly due to unlawful double tax laws and they are intended to protect the owner / partner of the business.

The confusion could've been avoided if an attorney and bookkeeper were available to describe the process, before the agreement was made and/or written. The condition they submit for incorporation makes a huge difference however, it does not seem to be the circumstance.

choices : )

explanation:

answera public company has access to more capital;