Business, 12.02.2020 00:36 haza1873

On July 1, Job 46 had a beginning balance of $740. During July, prime costs added to the job totaled $620. Of that amount, direct materials were three times as much as direct labor. The ending balance of the job was $1,600.

Required:

1. What was overhead applied to the job during July?
$ 240

2. What was direct materials for Job 46 for July? Direct labor? If rounding is required, round your answers to the nearest cent.

Direct labor $ 155
Direct materials $ 465
3. Assuming that overhead is applied on the basis of direct labor cost, what is the overhead rate for the company? Round your answer to the nearest whole percent.
%

1. Find overhead applied by adding beginning balance to prime costs and subtracting from ending balance.

2. Set up equation for prime cost using direct materials and direct labor. Let direct materials equal 3 times direct labor.

3. Divide overhead by the direct labor for the rate.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 22.06.2019 19:00

Tri fecta, a partnership, had revenues of $369,000 in its first year of operations. the partnership has not collected on $45,000 of its sales and still owes $39,500 on $155,000 of merchandise it purchased. there was no inventory on hand at the end of the year. the partnership paid $27,000 in salaries. the partners invested $48,000 in the business and $23,000 was borrowed on a five-year note. the partnership paid $2,070 in interest that was the amount owed for the year and paid $9,500 for a two-year insurance policy on the first day of business. compute net income for the first year for tri fecta.

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 21:20

How success was the first day of the bus boycott

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 23.06.2019 08:20

As task uncertainty and interdependence increase, are a more effective coordination mechanism than

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 23.06.2019 15:00

How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? the environmental effects should be ignored since the plant is legal without mitigation. the environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. if the utility mitigates for the environmental effects, the project is not acceptable. however, before the company chooses to do the project without mitigation, it needs to make sure that any costs of "ill will" for not mitigating for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis. the environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. the environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. therefore, since the plant is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

On July 1, Job 46 had a beginning balance of $740. During July, prime costs added to the job totaled...

Questions