subject
Business, 28.12.2019 03:31 johnny2585

Suppose the environmental protection agency (epa) wants to mandate that all methane emissions must be reduced to zero in order to alleviate global warming in the united states. which of the following describes why most economists would disagree with this policy? a. reducing methane emissions is desirable, but whatever levels of pollution firms decide to emit privately are already efficient. b. society would not benefit from lower air pollution. c. the opportunity cost of zero pollution is much higher than its benefit. d. the environment isn't worth protecting.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 01:00
The law says your employer is responsible for providing you with a safe and healthy workplace. true or false?
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 05:50
Match each of the terms below with an example that fits the term. a. fungibility the production of gasoline b. inelasticity the switch from coffee to tea c. non-excludability the provision of national defense d. substitution the demand for cigarettes
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 11:00
Aprofessional does specialized work that's primarily: degree based. medical or legal. well paying. intellectual and creative
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 22:20
Which of the following events could increase the demand for labor? a. an increase in the marginal productivity of workers b. a decrease in the amount of capital available for workers to use c. a decrease in the wage paid to workers d. a decrease in output price
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Suppose the environmental protection agency (epa) wants to mandate that all methane emissions must b...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 06.11.2020 21:40
question
Mathematics, 06.11.2020 21:40
question
Mathematics, 06.11.2020 21:40