Joni kingbird inc. has the following amounts reported in its general ledger at the end of the current year.
organization costs $24,200
trademarks 16,500
discount on bonds payable 37,200
deposits with advertising agency for ads to promote goodwill of company 12,200
excess of cost over fair value of net identifiable assets of acquired subsidiary 77,200
cost of equipment acquired for research and development projects; the equipment has an alternative future use 87,200
costs of developing a secret formula for a product that is expected to be marketed for at least 20 years 83,400
on the basis of this information, compute the total amount to be reported by kingbird for intangible assets on its balance sheet at year-end.

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.