subject
Business, 21.12.2019 00:31 alyssaxsanchez

Amanufacturing firm is considering two locations for a plant to produce a new product. the two locations have fixed and variable costs as follows: atlanta: fixed costs (annual)= 8, vairable costs (per unit)=20 phoenix: fixed costs= 14, variable costs = 16 1. at what annual output would the company be indifferent between the two locations? 10,000 units 20,000 units 4,000 units 15,000 units 60,000 units 2. what would the total annual costs be for the phoenix location with an annual output of 10,000 units? $140,000 $220,000 $280,000 $300,000 $156,000 3. what would be the total annual costs at the point of indifference? $300,000 $760,000 $240,000 $380,000 $220,000 4. if annual demand is estimated to be 20,000 units, which location should the company select? either atlanta or phoenix reject both atlanta and phoenix phoenix atlanta build at both locations 5. if the annual demand will be 20,000 units, what would be the cost advantage of the better location?

a. $60,000
b. $460,000
c. $20,000
d. $480,000
e. $80,000

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 10:00
Marco works in the marketing department of a luxury fashion brand. he is making a presentation on the success of a recent marketing campaign that included a fashion show. which slide elements can he use to include photographs and footage of the fashion show in his presentation? marco can use the: table images audio option to include photographs and the: flowcharts images video option to include footage of the fashion show.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 10:40
Two assets have the following expected returns and standard deviations when the risk-free rate is 5%: asset a e(ra) = 18.5% σa = 20% asset b e(rb) = 15% σb = 27% an investor with a risk aversion of a = 3 would find that on a risk-return basis. a. only asset a is acceptable b. only asset b is acceptable c. neither asset a nor asset b is acceptable d. both asset a and asset b are acceptable
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 13:30
Jose recently died with a probate estate of $900,000. he was predeceased by his wife, guadalupe, and his daughter, lucy. he has two surviving children, pete and fred. jose was also survived by eight grandchildren, pete’s three children, naomi, daniel, nick; fred’s three children, heather, chris and steve; and lucy’s two children, david and rachel. jose’s will states the following “i leave everything to my three children. if any of my children shall predecease me then i leave their share to their heirs, per stirpes.” which of the following statements is correct? (a) under jose’s will rachel will receive $150,000. (b) under jose’s will chris will receive $150,000. (c) under jose’s will nick will receive $100,000. (d) under jose’s will pete will receive $200,000.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 20:50
Many potential buyers value high-quality used cars at the full-information market price of € p1 and lemons at € p2. a limited number of potential sellers value high-quality cars at € v1 ≤ p1 and lemons at € v2 ≤ p2. everyone is risk neutral. the share of lemons among all the used cars that might be potentially sold is € θ . suppose that the buyers incur a transaction cost of $200 to purchase a car. this transaction cost is the value of their time to find a car. what is the equilibrium? is it possible that no cars are sold
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Amanufacturing firm is considering two locations for a plant to produce a new product. the two locat...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 01.12.2020 01:00
question
Mathematics, 01.12.2020 01:00