Jack owns a 10% interest in a partnership (not real estate) in which his at-risk amount is $42,000 at the beginning of the year. during the year, the partnership borrows $80,000 on a nonrecourse note and incurs a loss of $60,000 from operations. jack's at-risk amount at the end of the year is $44,000. t/f

After calculation risk amount is $36000

But in question it is given $44000

So it is false statement

Explanation:

The amount which is paid by a taxpayer is in risk is expanded by a lot of extra plan of action obligation and diminished by the portion of misfortunes from the action.

The at-risk amount is not affected by non recourse debt. Jack's year-end at-risk amount is

But in question it is given that risk amount at the end will be $44000

So it is false statement

nice

explanation:

you two can make a great couple, goodluck caring for each other