There are two location alternatives: atlanta and baltimore. the most important factors are raw material supply, transportation costs, and labor costs at these two locations. the weights of these factors are 0.5, 0.4 and 0.1. and he scores with respect to these three factors were determined as 60, 80, and 70 for atlanta; and 70, 50 and 90 for baltimore. if the management has determined a minimum acceptable score of 75, they should:

a. build a plant in both cities.
b. choose atlanta.
c. choose baltimore.
d. be indifferent between these locations.
e. reject both locations.

Which statement describes a monopoly? many firms produce identical products with no control over the market price. many firms produce differentiated products with control over market price. a single firm produces a product with no close substitutes and control over the market price. a single firm produces a product with many close substitutes and limited control over the market price.

At the beginning of 2014, winston corporation issued 10% bonds with a face value of $2,000,000. these bonds mature in five years, and interest is paid semiannually on june 30 and december 31. the bonds were sold for $1,852,800 to yield 12%. winston uses a calendar-year reporting period. using the effective-interest method of amortization, what amount of interest expense should be reported for 2014? (round your answer to the nearest dollar.)

Kendra knight took part in a friendly game of touch football. she had played before and was familiar with football. michael jewett was on her team. in the course of play, michael bumped into kendra and knocked her to the ground. he stepped on her hand, causing injury to a little finger that later required its amputation. she sued michael for damages. he defended on the ground that she had assumed the risk. kendra claimed that assumption of risk could not be raised as a defense because the state legislature had adopted the standard of comparative negligence. what happens if contributory negligence applies? what happens if the defense of comparative negligence applies?