Peter, the owner of happy burger, is involved in the company's daily decisions and has established procedures for every task. the company rules are clearly specified in the handbook, and peter also believes in the close supervision of all employees.
happy burger is a(n) organization.

a) informal
b) non-hierarchical
c) organic
d) decentralized
e) mechanistic

Choose the best term for each definitionexpense, liability, monetary asset, statement of financial position, tangible asset, net worth, market value, investment asset, income, assetitems of monetary value a person or household ownsmoney spentmoney receivedfinancial assets purchased with the hope that they will generate income and appreciate in value to make it possible to sell at a higher price in the futurea debt or obligation owed to othersthe amount you could realistically sell an asset forassets that can be quickly and easily converted into casha measure of financial wealth and indicates the monetary value of all possessions that a person or household owns, minus the total amounts owed to othersa financial statement that describes an individual or family's financial condition on a specified date by showing assets, liabilities, and net worthpersonal property that was purchased to create a lifestyle or improve your life

Martha is the head of the accounts department in a small manufacturing company. the company follows the accrual-basis method of accounting. it recently purchased raw materials worth $5,000 from its vendors. however, the company paid only $3,000 to its vendors. it plans to pay the remaining amount after three months. considering this information, which entry should martha record in the company’s accounts? a. $5,000 as accounts receivable b. $3,000 as accounts payable c. $2,000 as accounts payable d. $2,000 as accounts receivable

David paid $975,000 for two beachfront lots in coastal south carolina, with the intention of building residential homes on each. two years later, the south carolina legislature passed the beachfront management act, barring any further development of the coast, including david's lots. when david files a complaint to seek compensation for his property, south carolina refuses, pointing to a passage in david's own complaint that states "the beachfront management act [was] properly and validly designed to south carolina's " is south carolina required to compensate david under the takings clause?