subject
Business, 03.12.2019 18:31 kob3965

Afirm is making an economic loss of $100,000.
this means that:

a. the firm should immediately exit industry

b. firm could increase economic profit if its resources were used in a different way

c. firm is not making an accounting profit

d. firms revenues are less than its opportunity costs

if a firm is making an economic profit of zero:

a. it is not making an accounting profit

b. it cannot make a higher economic profit by changing how it is using its resources

c. firm should change to a different line of business

d. it will have unhappy stockholders

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 19:30
Henry crouch's law office has traditionally ordered ink refills 7070 units at a time. the firm estimates that carrying cost is 4545% of the $1212 unit cost and that annual demand is about 245245 units per year. the assumptions of the basic eoq model are thought to apply. for what value of ordering cost would its action be optimal? a) for what value of ordering cost would its action be optimal? its action would be optimal given an ordering cost of $nothing per order (round your response to two decimal place
Answers: 3
question
Business, 21.06.2019 22:30
Quantitative problem: you need $20,000 to purchase a used car. your wealthy uncle is willing to lend you the money as an amortized loan. he would like you to make annual payments for 4 years, with the first payment to be made one year from today. he requires a 8% annual return. what will be your annual loan payments? round your answer to the nearest cent. do not round intermediate calculations. $ how much of your first payment will be applied to interest and to principal repayment? round your answer to the nearest cent. do not round intermediate calculations. interest: $ principal repayment
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 06:10
Amanda works as an industrial designer
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 07:50
In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Afirm is making an economic loss of $100,000.
this means that:

a. the firm should...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 13.01.2021 23:00
question
English, 13.01.2021 23:00
question
Mathematics, 13.01.2021 23:00
question
Mathematics, 13.01.2021 23:00
question
English, 13.01.2021 23:00