subject
Business, 20.11.2019 17:31 conyabrew82

You work for adsmart, a marketing research firm. you and a new coworker are meeting a potential client for lunch. you have several morning meetings on the same day as the lunch meeting, so you arrange to meet your coworker and the potential client at 12: 15 p. m. at the restaurant. you arrive five minutes early, and the prospective client arrives shortly thereafter. you both wait in the lobby until 12: 35 p. m. when you decide to be seated. you check your smart phone and see no received communications from your colleague. finally, at 12: 45 p. m., your coworker arrives. during the lunch, your coworker tells several white lies and reveals information regarding your boss that should have been kept confidential. the prospective client doesn't seem to notice these indiscretions; however, when your coworker begins to badmouth his former employer, a competitor of adsmart, the client appears ill at ease. despite the rough start to the lunch meeting, all ends well. you believe that with the appropriate follow-up, the potential client will become one of the firm's more lucrative partnerships. once you are back at the office, you debrief with your coworker and discuss the next steps. you decide to take on the task of putting together the proposal the client has requested, and your colleague agrees to send a follow-up note the client and indicating that the proposal will arrive within the next week. when you send off the proposal three days later, you inadvertently learn from the client that he never received any correspondence from your coworker. what dimension of professional behavior did your coworker initially violate by arriving late for lunch? a. honesty and ethics b. courtesy and respect c. reliability and responsibility

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 07:30
Read the following scenario and answer the question in 5-10 sentences. you are the owner of a small business that is a defendant in a lawsuit in federal court. you received bad news from your lawyer that the judge did not allow certain documents to be admitted as evidence in court and that the jury reached a $50,000 verdict in favor of the plaintiff. your lawyer tells you that it is within your legal right to hire him to file an appeal with the united states court of appeals. if the appellate court rules in your favor, you may be able to avoid paying part or all of the $50,000. evaluate your lawyer’s suggestion about appealing the decision.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 08:50
Dyed-denim corporation is seeking to lower the costs of value creation and achieve a low-cost position. as a result, it plans to move its manufacturing plant from the u.s. to thailand, which based on company research, is the optimal location for production. this strategic move will most likely allow the company to realize
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 13:00
Explain the relationship between consumers and producers in economic growth and activity
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 22:20
Which of the following best explains why the demand for housing is more flexible than the supply? a. new housing developments are being constructed all the time. b. low interest rates for mortgages make buying a home very affordable. c. the increasing population always drives demand upwards. d. people can move more easily than producers can build new homes.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
You work for adsmart, a marketing research firm. you and a new coworker are meeting a potential clie...
Questions
question
Arts, 24.08.2020 17:01
question
Mathematics, 24.08.2020 17:01
question
Mathematics, 24.08.2020 17:01
question
Mathematics, 24.08.2020 17:01