There seems to be a paradox between goods and money. consider the following. would you be better off if the amount of: a) food and clothing you have suddenly doubled? b) food and clothing everyone has suddenly doubled? c) money you have suddenly doubles? d) money everyone has suddenly doubles (there is no change in national output)? identify which of the above situations would you be better off in? (simply list a, b, c, and/or d). next, explain the difference in your answers to parts b and d. why are you better off in one and not the other?

How supply and demand work together to reach the equilibrium price in the marketplace? give at least a paragraph. you!

Hi inr 2002 class! i just uploaded a detailed study guide for this class. you can check-out a free preview by following the link below feel free to reach-out to me if you need a study buddy or have any questions. goodluck!

Schonhardt corporation's relevant range of activity is 2,500 units to 5,500 units. when it produces and sells 4,000 units, its average costs per unit are as follows: averagecost per unitdirect materials $ 7.60direct labor $ 2.90variable manufacturing overhead $ 1.65fixed manufacturing overhead $ 2.90fixed selling expense $ 0.95fixed administrative expense $ 0.65sales commissions $ 0.75variable administrative expense $ 0.65if 4,500 units are produced, the total amount of fixed manufacturing cost incurred is closest to: multiple choicea $16,800b $11,400c $11,600d $15,400