On may 1, study and burrow, two college professors, entered into and oral contract under which study agreed to sell his computer to burrow for $1,300, with delivery and payment on may 15. on may 2, study sent burrow a signed letter confirming all the terms of their oral contract. burrow received study’s letter on may 3 but never responded. on may 15, study tendered delivery of the computer to burrow, but burrow refused to accept or pay for it, stating that he had changed his mind and did not need study’s computer. study sues burrow for breach of contract. burrow pleads the statute of frauds as a defense.(a) judgment for whom? explain.(b) if study and burrow were merchants who sold computers, judgment for whom? explain.