subject
Business, 28.10.2019 23:31 fatlip2429

Suppose that in 2002 the market for rented apartments in manhattan has the following supply and demand curves: q 4000 -p qs1000+4p where p is the monthly rent. what is the equilibrium price (rent) for an apartment? how many apartments are built and rented out? now suppose the government imposes rent control, ruling that rents may not rise above $500. what is the excess demand (shortage) of apartments? what is the total deadweight loss (in dollars)? in 2003 the population of manhattan rises by 100, which increases the quantity demanded at any price by 100. what is the new demand curve? in the absence of rent control, what would the equilibrium price and quantity be? what would be the increase from 2002 to 2003 in the quantity of housing supplied? suppose the rent control of the previous year is still in place. what is the increase in the quantity of housing supplied? what is the excess demand (shortage) of apartments? what is the deadweight loss? based on your answers to 2 and 6, how might rent controls explain why it is getting harder and harder to find an apartment in manhattan? suppose no rent control existed, and the equilibrium rent (price) prevailed. what would be the percentage growth in rental rates from 2002 to 2003? suppose rents continued to grow at this rate. how many years would it take for the rental rate to double? 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 00:30
Aprice ceiling is “binding” if the price ceiling is set below the equilibrium price. suppose that the equilibrium price is $5. if a price ceiling is set at $6, this will not affect the market in any way since $5 remains a legally allowable price (since $5 < $6). a price ceiling of $6 is called a “non-binding” price ceiling. on the other hand, if the price ceiling is set at $4, the price ceiling is “binding” because the natural equilibrium price is $5 but that is no longer allowed. what happens when there is a binding price ceiling? at a price below the equilibrium price, quantity demanded exceeds quantity supplied. there is a shortage. normally, price increases eliminate shortages by increasing quantity supplied and decreasing quantity demanded. in this case, however, price increases are not allowed past the price ceiling. we therefore predict that the observed market price will be right at the price ceiling and there will be a permanent shortage. the observed quantity bought and sold will be dictated by the quantity supplied at the price ceiling. although consumers would like to buy more, there are no more units for sale
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 18:50
Suppose the government enacts a stimulus program composed of $600 billion of new government spending and $300 billion of tax cuts for an economy currently producing a gdp of $14 comma 000 billion. if all of the new spending occurs in the current year and the government expenditure multiplier is 1.5, the expenditure portion of the stimulus package will add nothing percentage points of extra growth to the economy. (round your response to two decimal places.)
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 19:10
According to the textbook chapter, “the emotional connection of distinguishing differences and conflict”, which of the following groups of terms describes best the skills/resources that managers need when managing differences in their organization? energy, commitment, tolerance, and appreciation energy, adequate funding, tolerance, and appreciation funding, tolerance, a strong hr department, and tolerance energy, a strong hr department, patience, and strong leadership skills
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 21:20
Suppose life expectancy in years (l) is a function of two inputs, health expenditures (h) and nutrition expenditures (n) in hundreds of dollars per year. the production function is upper l equals ch superscript 0.40 baseline upper n superscript 0.60l=ch0.40n0.60. beginning with c = 1, a health input of $400400 per year (hequals=44) and a nutrition input of $400400 per year (nequals=44), show that the marginal product of health expenditures and the marginal product of nutrition expenditures are both decreasing. the marginal product of health expenditures when h goes from 44 to 55 is nothing, and the marginal product of health when h goes from 66 to 77 is nothing. (round your answers to three decimal places.)
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Suppose that in 2002 the market for rented apartments in manhattan has the following supply and dema...
Questions