Business, 25.10.2019 22:43 LeoValdez5782

What is the incidence of a tax?

question 3 options:

the sum of a tax and a product’s price

the final burden of a tax

the levying of a tax on consumers

the ratio of a tax to a product’s price

Answers: 1

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 22.06.2019 13:50

The retained earnings account has a credit balance of $24,650 before closing entries are made. if total revenues for the period are $77,700, total expenses are $56,900, and dividends are $13,050, what is the ending balance in the retained earnings account after all closing entries are made?

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 23.06.2019 00:00

Wo firms, a and b, each currently dump 50 tons of chemicals into the local river. the government has decided to reduce the pollution and from now on will require a pollution permit for each ton of pollution dumped into the river. it costs firm a $100 for each ton of pollution that it eliminates before it reaches the river, and it costs firm b $50 for each ton of pollution that it eliminates before it reaches the river. the government gives each firm 20 pollution permits. government officials are not sure whether to allow the firms to buy or sell the pollution permits to each other. what is the total cost of reducing pollution if firms are not allowed to buy and sell pollution permits from each other? what is the total cost of reducing pollution if the firms are allowed to buy and sell permits from each other? a. $3,000; $1,500 b. $4,500; $3,500 c. $4,500; $4,000 d. $4,500; $2,500

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 23.06.2019 07:30

What criteria does a company have to meet to be considered a monopoly?

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 23.06.2019 15:00

How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? the environmental effects should be ignored since the plant is legal without mitigation. the environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. if the utility mitigates for the environmental effects, the project is not acceptable. however, before the company chooses to do the project without mitigation, it needs to make sure that any costs of "ill will" for not mitigating for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis. the environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. the environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. therefore, since the plant is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

What is the incidence of a tax?

question 3 options:

the sum of a tax and a...

Questions