Suppose that italy and sweden both produce jeans and stained glass. italy's opportunity cost of producing a pane of stained glass is 4 pairs of jeans while sweden's opportunity cost of producing a pane of stained glass is 10 pairs of jeans. by comparing the opportunity cost of producing stained glass in the two countries, you can tell that has a comparative advantage in the production of stained glass and has a comparative advantage in the production of jeans. suppose that italy and sweden consider trading stained glass and jeans with each other. italy can gain from specialization and trade as long as it receives more than of jeans for each pane of stained glass it exports to sweden. similarly, sweden can gain from trade as long as it receives more than of stained glass for each pair of jeans it exports to italy. based on your answer to the last question, which of the following terms of trade (that is, price of stained glass in terms of jeans) would allow both sweden and italy to gain from trade? check all that apply.

(a) 18 pairs of jeans per pane of stained glass
(b) 2 pairs of jeans per pane of stained glass
(c) 8 pairs of jeans per pane of stained glass
(d) 1 pair of jeans per pane of stained glass

Steffi is reviewing various licenses and their uses. match the licenses to their respective uses. you are eligible to work within the state. you are eligible to sell limited investment securities. you are eligible to sell fixed income investment products. your compensation is fee based. section 6 section 7 section 63 section 65

In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?

Describe two (2) financial career options that an individual with a finance education might pursue and explain the value that such a position adds to a company. explain the essential skills that would make a person successful in each of the described positions. recommend one (1) of the career options. identify the most attractive features of the position.