We provide strategic consulting services. in 2011, we completed a consulting engagement for clarent corporation. we use normal absorption costing, with corporate overhead costs allocated to engagements using engagement revenues as the allocation base. the engagement revenues for clarent was $3,325,000. the engagement expenses for clarent was $1,219,990. our estimated total 2011 engagement revenues equaled $373,000,000. what was our total 2011 estimated corporate overhead?

Which of the following is likely not a benefit of requiring a grand jury to listen to and examine all of the evidence against a person suspected of committing a serious crime and then independently deciding whether or not to hand down an indictment? 1.the grand jury system provides the accused another safeguard against being sent to trial and facing conviction based on flawed evidence. 2.the members of the grand jury are drawn from the community and are empowered to render independent decisions about whether or not the government has collected enough evidence to bring an individual to trial. 3.the grand jury’s decision can provide prosecutors insight into what is necessary to build a sufficient case if a similar crime is presented later. 4.the grand jury is impaneled to rubber-stamp prosecutors’ cases, which makes it possible for more cases to reach trial.