An owner abandoned his van in an alley in chicago. in spite of repeated complaints to the police, the van was allowed to remain in the alley. after several months, it was stripped of most of the parts that could be removed. jamin ortiz, age 11, was walking down the alley when the van’s gas tank exploded. the flames from the explosion set fire to jamin’s clothing, and he was severely burned. jamin and his family brought suit against the city of chicago to recover damages for his injuries. could the city be held responsible for injuries caused by property owned by someone else? why or why not? [ortiz v. chicago, 398 n. e.2d 1007 (ill. app.)]

$527.7.if the following was the question  $527.7 is the answer.students who are trying to raise funds have an agreement with a local pizza chain. the chain has agreed to sell them pizzas at a discount, which the students can then resell to families in the local community for a profit. it is expected that of the 500 families in the community, at most 70% will buy pizza. based on a survey of their personal preferences, the students believe that they should order no more than 120 cheese pizzas, no more than 150 pepperoni pizzas, and no more than 100 vegetarian pizzas. they also want to make sure that at least 20% of the total pizzas are cheese and at least 50% of the pizzas are pepperoni. they make a profit of $1.45, $1.75, and $1.98, respectively, for each cheese, pepperoni, and vegetarian pizza they resell. how many pizzas of each type should they buy?