subject
Business, 20.09.2019 20:10 j015

Terms of trade suppose that greece and germany both produce oil and stained glass. greece's opportunity cost of producing a pane of stained glass is 4 barrels of oil while germany's opportunity cost of producing a pane of stained glass is 10 barrels of oil. by comparing the opportunity cost of producing stained glass in the two countries, you can tell that (greece / germany) has a comparative advantage in the production of stained glass and (greece / germany) has a comparative advantage in the production of oil. suppose that greece and germany consider trading stained glass and oil with each other. greece can gain from specialization and trade as long as it receives more than a. 1 barrel b. 1/10 barrel c. 1/4 barrel d. 4 barrels e. 10 barrels of oil for each pane of stained glass it exports to germany. similarly, germany can gain from trade as long as it receives more than a. 1 pane b. 1/10 pane c. 1/4 pane d. 4 panes e. 10 panes of stained glass for each barrel of oil it exports to greece. based on your answer to the last question, which of the following prices of trade (that is, price of stained glass in terms of oil) would allow both germany and greece to gain from trade? check all that apply. 8 barrels of oil per pane of stained glass 2 barrels of oil per pane of stained glass 6 barrels of oil per pane of stained glass 18 barrels of oil per pane of stained glass

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 07:30
Which of the following is an example of an unsought good? a. cameron purchases a new bike. b. jordan buys paper towels. c. taylor buys cupcakes from her favorite bakery. d. riley buys new windshield wipers for her car.
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 07:50
In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 10:30
Jack manufacturing company had beginning work in process inventory of $8,000. during the period, jack transferred $34,000 of raw materials to work in process. labor costs amounted to $41,000 and overhead amounted to $36,000. if the ending balance in work in process inventory was $12,000, what was the amount transferred to finished goods inventory?
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 11:00
Acompany that adapts its product mix to meet the needs of a new market is using which of the following global marketing strategies market development diversification strategy product development undiversified
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Terms of trade suppose that greece and germany both produce oil and stained glass. greece's opportun...
Questions