subject
Business, 11.09.2019 03:30 azzyla2003

Suppose that an increase in capital per hour worked from $15,000 to $20,000 increases real gdp per hour worked by $500. if capital per hour worked increases further to $25,000, by how much would you expect real gdp per hour worked to increase if there are diminishing returns?
a. by exactly $500
b. by less than $500
c. by more than $500 but less than $5,000
d. by more than $5,000 but less than $20,000

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 04:10
You are head of the schwartz family endowment for the arts. you have decided to fund an arts school in the san francisco bay area in perpetuity. every 5 years, you will give the school $ 1 comma 000 comma 000. the first payment will occur 5 years from today. if the interest rate is 5.9 % per year, what is the present value of your gift?
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 20:50
How has apple been able to sustain its competitive advantage in the smartphone industry? a. by reducing its network effects b. by targeting its new products and services toward laggards c. by driving the price for the end user to zero d. by regularly introducing incremental improvements in its products
Answers: 1
question
Business, 23.06.2019 00:00
How much is a 2019 tesla? ? exact price trying to buy for my 6 year old sister
Answers: 2
question
Business, 23.06.2019 17:30
Why is the cournot equilibrium an​ equilibrium? a. there are​ short-run barriers to exit in a cournot​ duopoly, so both firms cannot alter their output levels. b. given the other​ firm's level of​ production, both firms are maximizing profits and cannot improve their situation by unilaterally altering their level of output. c. both firms operate at zero profit under a cournot​ equilibrium, so they would face negative profits if they change output. d. both firms operate at minimum​ long-run average cost under a cournot​ equilibrium, so changes to output would reduce​ long-run profits. even if they​ can't collude, why​ don't firms set their outputs at the joint​ profit-maximizing levels​ (i.e., the levels they would have chosen had they​ colluded)? a. given that other firm produces at the collusive​ level, a firm could increase their own profits by increasing output above the collusive level. b. the midpoint of the collusion curve​ (i.e., the collusive​ outcome) lies below the reaction​ curves, so both firms have an incentive to increase output under the cournot duopoly. c. both a and b are correct d. both a and b are incorrect
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Suppose that an increase in capital per hour worked from $15,000 to $20,000 increases real gdp per h...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 29.07.2019 03:30
question
Mathematics, 29.07.2019 03:30