Business, 07.08.2019 05:10 egyptforrest9892

Alandowner and a contractor entered into a written contract under which the contractor agreed to build a building and pave an adjacent sidewalk for the landowner at a price of $200,000. later, while construction was proceeding, the landowner and the contractor entered into an oral modification under which the contractor was not obligated to pave the sidewalk, but still would be entitled to $200,000 upon completion. the contractor completed the building. the landowner, after discussions with his landscaper, demanded that the contractor pave the adjacent sidewalk. the contractor refused. has the contractor breached the contract? (a) no, because the oral modification was in good faith and therefore enforceable.(b) yes, because a discharge of a contractual obligation must be in writing.(c) yes, because the parol evidence rule bars proof of the oral modification.(d) yes, because there was no consideration for the discharge of the contractor’s duty to pave the sidewalk.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 22.06.2019 02:40

The following accounts are denominated in pesos as of december 31, 2015. for reporting purposes, these amounts need to be stated in u.s. dollars. for each balance, indicate the exchange rate that would be used if a translation is made under the current rate method. then, again for each account, provide the exchange rate that would be necessary if a remeasurement is being made using the temporal method. the company was started in 2000. the buildings were acquired in 2002 and the patents in 2003. (round your answers to 2 decimal places.) exchange rates for 1 peso are as follows: 2000 1 peso = $ 0.28 2002 1 = 0.26 2003 1 = 0.25 january 1, 2015 1 = 0.24 april 1, 2015 1 = 0.23 july 1, 2015 1 = 0.22 october 1, 2015 1 = 0.20 december 31, 2015 1 = 0.16 average for 2015 1 = 0.19

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 03:00

If you were running a company, what are at least two things you could do to improve its productivity.

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 05:40

Grant, inc., acquired 30% of south co.’s voting stock for $200,000 on january 2, year 1, and did not elect the fair value option. the price equaled the carrying amount and the fair value of the interest purchased in south’s net assets. grant’s 30% interest in south gave grant the ability to exercise significant influence over south’s operating and financial policies. during year 1, south earned $80,000 and paid dividends of $50,000. south reported earnings of $100,000 for the 6 months ended june 30, year 2, and $200,000 for the year ended december 31, year 2. on july 1, year 2, grant sold half of its stock in south for $150,000 cash. south paid dividends of $60,000 on october 1, year 2. before income taxes, what amount should grant include in its year 1 income statement as a result of the investment?

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 06:30

If the findings and the results are not presented properly, the research completed was a waste of time and money. true false

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Alandowner and a contractor entered into a written contract under which the contractor agreed to bui...

Questions

Business, 10.03.2020 03:23

You have calculated the historical dollar-weighted return, annual geometric average return, and annual arithmetic average return. You always reinvest...