Business, 22.07.2019 17:20 saurav76

Sally goes to have her hair trimmed and agrees to pay $40 to the stylist. while there, sally decides that she would also like highlights. the stylist informs her that highlights will cost an additional $30. sally agrees to the price, gets the highlights, but refuses to pay the extra amount. what is the likely result in a dispute between sally and the stylist, and why? multiple choicethe stylist will win because she did additional work in exchange for the extra payment; therefore, sally's promise was supported by valid consideration. the stylist will win because she did additional work in exchange for the extra payment; therefore, a valid unilateral contract existed. the stylist will win unless sally can show that she had previously received both a trim and highlights for $40. if she can prove that she previously received both for $40, the “past expectations” rule applies. sally will win because the stylist had a preexisting duty to have her hair looking its finest. sally will win because there was no valid consideration given in exchange for the highlighting.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 22.06.2019 11:40

Define the marginal rate of substitution between two goods (x and y). if a consumer’s preferences are given by u(x,y) = x3/4y1/4, compute the consumer’s marginal rate of substitution as a function of x and y. calculate the mrs if the consumer has chosen to consumer 48 units of x and 16 units of y. show your work. (use the back of the page if necessary.

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 13:40

Determine if the following statements are true or false. an increase in government spending can crowd out private investment. an improvement in the budget balance increases the demand for financial capital. an increase in private consumption may crowd out private investment. lower interest rates can lead to private investment being crowded out. a trade balance in sur+ increases the supply of financial capital. if private savings is equal to private investment, then there is neither a budget sur+ nor a budget deficit.

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 21:10

An investor purchases 500 shares of nevada industries common stock for $22.00 per share today. at t = 1 year, this investor receives a $0.42 per share dividend (which is not reinvested) on the 500 shares and purchases an additional 500 shares for $24.75 per share. at t = 2 years, he receives another $0.42 (not reinvested) per share dividend on 1,000 shares and purchases 600 more shares for $31.25 per share. at t = 3 years, he sells 1,000 of the shares for $35.50 per share and the remaining 600 shares at $36.00 per share, but receives no dividends. assuming no commissions or taxes, the money-weighted rate of return received on this investment is closest to:

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 21:20

Which of the following best describes vertical integration? a. produce goods or services previously purchasedb. develop the ability to produce products that complement the original productc. develop the ability to produce the specified good more efficiently than befored. build long term partnerships with a few supplierse. sell products to a supplier or a distributor

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

Sally goes to have her hair trimmed and agrees to pay $40 to the stylist. while there, sally decides...

Questions