subject
Business, 05.02.2020 01:51 mckenziebeach5ox9oy3

According to the u. s. robinson patman act of 1936, price discrimination a. may be used to drive rivals out of business. b. is legal unless it harms competition. c. can only be justified if the price discrimination is due to actual cost differences. d. is always illegal.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 19:30
In business,what would be the input, conversion and output of operating a summer band camp
Answers: 1
question
Business, 21.06.2019 21:30
White company has two departments, cutting and finishing. the company uses a job-order costing system and computes a predetermined overhead rate in each department. the cutting department bases its rate on machine-hours, and the finishing department bases its rate on direct labor-hours. at the beginning of the year, the company made the following estimates: department cutting finishing direct labor-hours 6,000 30,000 machine-hours 48,000 5,000 total fixed manufacturing overhead cost $ 264,000 $ 366,000 variable manufacturing overhead per machine-hour $ 2.00 " variable manufacturing overhead per direct labor-hour " $ 4.00 required: 1. compute the predetermined overhead rate for each department. 2. the job cost sheet for job 203, which was started and completed during the year, showed the following: department cutting finishing direct labor-hours 6 20 machine-hours 80 4 direct materials $ 500 $ 310 direct labor cost $ 108 $ 360 using the predetermined overhead rates that you computed in requirement (1), compute the total manufacturing cost assigned to job 203. 3. would you expect substantially different amounts of overhead cost to be assigned to some jobs if the company used a plantwide predetermined overhead rate based on direct labor-hours, rather than using departmental rates?
Answers: 3
question
Business, 21.06.2019 22:00
Sharon had some insider information about a corporate takeover. she unintentionally informed a friend, who immediately bought the stock in the target corporation. the takeover occurred and the friend made a substantial profit from buying and selling the stock. the friend told sharon about his stock dealings, and gave her a pearl necklace because she "made it all possible." the necklace was worth $10,000, but she already owned more jewelry than she desired.
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 09:00
Aminor has the legal right to repudiate
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
According to the u. s. robinson patman act of 1936, price discrimination a. may be used to drive riv...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 28.09.2019 12:10