Caveat emptor as a legal principle continues to be recognized because a. sellers don’t want to be bothered with quality. b. the courts place some level of responsibility on consumers to make certain they know what they are buying and its general quality; otherwise, courts would be forever resolving small disputes. c. common law is less expensive to enforce than more contemporary laws. d. caveat emptor is no longer a recognized legal principle.

Suppose the government decides to issue a new savings bond that is guaranteed to double in value if you hold it for 20 years. assume you purchase a bond that costs $25. a. what is the exact rate of return you would earn if you held the bond for 20 years until it doubled in value? (do not round intermediate calculations and enter your answer as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.) b. if you purchased the bond for $25 in 2017 at the then current interest rate of .27 percent year, how much would the bond be worth in 2027? (do not round intermediate calculations and round your answer to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.) c. in 2027, instead of cashing in the bond for its then current value, you decide to hold the bond until it doubles in face value in 2037. what annual rate of return will you earn over the last 10 years? (do not