subject
Business, 28.06.2019 05:00 ayoismeisalex

Suppose first main street bank, second republic bank, and third fidelity bank all have zero excess reserves. the required reserve ratio is 5%. the federal reserve buys a government bond worth $200,000 from rajiv, a client of first main street bank. he deposits the money into his checking account at first main street bank. complete the following table to reflect any changes in first main street bank's t-account (before the bank makes any new loans). assets liabilities complete the following table to show the effect of a new deposit on excess and required reserves when the required reserve ratio is 5%. hint: if the change is negative, be sure to enter the value as negative number. amount deposited ($) change in excess reserves ($) change in required reserves ($) 200,000 now, suppose first main street bank loans out all of its new excess reserves to maria, who immediately uses the funds to write a check to kevin. kevin deposits the funds immediately into his checking account at second republic bank. then second republic bank lends out all of its new excess reserves to rajiv, who writes a check to simone, who deposits the money into her account at third fidelity bank. third fidelity lends out all of its new excess reserves to ana as well. fill in the following table to show the effect of this ongoing chain of events at each bank. enter each answer to the nearest dollar. increase in deposits ($) increase in required reserves ($) increase in loans ($) first main street bank second republic bank third fidelity bank assume this process continues, with each successive loan deposited into a checking account and no banks keeping any excess reserves. under these assumptions, the $200,000 injection into the money supply results in an overall increase in demand deposit

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 07:50
In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 19:00
The east asiatic company (eac), a danish company with subsidiaries throughout asia, has been funding its bangkok subsidiary primarily with u.s. dollar debt because of the cost and availability of dollar capital as opposed to thai baht-denominated (b) debt. the treasurer of eac-thailand is considering a 1-year bank loan for $247,000.the current spot rate is b32.03 /$, and the dollar-based interest is 6.78% for the 1-year period. 1-year loans are 12.04% in baht.a. assuming expected inflation rates of 4.3 % and 1.24% in thailand and the united states, respectively, for the coming year, according to purchase power parity, what would the effective cost of funds be in thai baht terms? b. if eac's foreign exchange advisers believe strongly that the thai government wants to push the value of the baht down against the dollar by5% over the coming year (to promote its export competitiveness in dollar markets), what might the effective cost of funds end up being in baht terms? c. if eac could borrow thai baht at 13% per annum, would this be cheaper than either part (a) or part (b) above?
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 22:30
Luggage world buys briefcases with an invoice date of september 28. the terms of sale are 2/10 eom. what is the net date for this invoice
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 23:00
The five steps to financial success a. five money myths b. five foundations
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Suppose first main street bank, second republic bank, and third fidelity bank all have zero excess r...
Questions
question
English, 30.04.2021 01:00
question
Mathematics, 30.04.2021 01:00
question
Mathematics, 30.04.2021 01:00
question
Spanish, 30.04.2021 01:00
question
Mathematics, 30.04.2021 01:00
question
Mathematics, 30.04.2021 01:00