In its ads for athletic shoes, sleek feet llc uses a trademark that is similar, but not identical, to the famous, registered mark of thor, inc. sleek feet's unauthorized use of the mark constitutes trademark dilution, provided that?

Dilution creates a likelihood of confusion as to the source of the product or service being identified by the allegedly infringing use: With a famous mark, any other use has the potential for confusion, since consumers may assume affiliation with the owner of the mark regardless of the product or service.

answer; ///i believe the correct two answer are (1) paid in capital; and (2) earned   capital; good luck

i think the answer would be b hope this