Paulo makes the argument that the asteroid strike that likely contributed to the extinction of the dinosaurs was a short-tem environmental change because it happened so quickly. which is the best analysis of paulo’s position? he is correct; it happened in just a few seconds. he is correct; it did not cause any long-term changes. he is incorrect; it caused long-term changes. he is incorrect; impacts are not environmental changes.

He is incorrect, it caused long-term changes.

Explanation:

A short term change is the one which exert a small impact over the environment which could be recover soon. Like drought, volcanic eruption, and pollution. A long term change is the one which exert a large and drastic impact over the environment which either does not recover or takes long time to recover.

The extinction of dinosaur due to asteroid strike is a long-term change because it has wiped large diversity of dinosaurs from earth. This loss was not compensated.

preservation because he preserves part of the land and preserves means save

explanation: