subject
Biology, 30.09.2019 23:30 sama3638

Ascientist hypothesized that oxygen atoms from both carbon dioxide and water are used to make glucose during photosynthesis. however, experimental results using oxygen isotopes showed that all of the oxygen from the water ended up in the oxygen molecules that were produced. none of the oxygen from water was found in glucose.

what should the scientist do to best gain scientific understanding of this topic?

a) analyze what could have happened, and change the experimental methods to retest the hypotheses in a different way.

b) discard the faulty results that do not support the original hypothesis, and repeat the experiment using the same methods.

c) analyze the procedural errors that took place in the experiment, and summarize these in a conclusion statement.

d) repeat the experiment and adjust new data to support the original hypothesis.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Biology

question
Biology, 21.06.2019 14:30
Why do you think water is so important to living things
Answers: 2
question
Biology, 21.06.2019 21:00
In natural selection, what is actually “selected? ” a) alleles are directly selected b) genotypes are directly selected c) phenotypes are directly selected d) entire populations are directly selected
Answers: 2
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 05:00
This is so important ugh its 25 points
Answers: 2
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 09:00
How does photosynthesis show the conservation of mass and energy?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Ascientist hypothesized that oxygen atoms from both carbon dioxide and water are used to make glucos...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 21.05.2021 07:10
question
Mathematics, 21.05.2021 07:10
question
Mathematics, 21.05.2021 07:10
question
Computers and Technology, 21.05.2021 07:10
question
Mathematics, 21.05.2021 07:10
question
Mathematics, 21.05.2021 07:10