Jim and tom are trying to determine whether their ideas are scientific or pseudoscientific. jim's idea is non-testable, and tom's idea gives different results to different scientists. which statement is correct about jim and tom's idea? both ideas could be scientific. neither idea could be scientific. only jim's idea could be scientific. only tom's idea could be scientific.

Only toms idea can be scientific

Explanation:

hey bro i looked it up on google the structure of the eye-spot in euglena viridie, e. ehrenbergii, and phacus pyriyorme is not as franzé haa described it. the so-called “crystal body” and “lens bodies” were not found in any of the individuals of the species examined by me. as earlier observers have stated, the eye-spot consists simply of a mass of pigment granules arranged in a single layer, and probably embedded in a protoplasmic framework, but the latter could not be seen, and its presence was only inferred from the fact that the pigment granules must be held together in some way, thd the eye-spot as a whole is capable of expansion, and that the pigment granules can be separated from each other.

hope this   and an i get brainlsiest

whats the answer to your question?