Will give brainlest according to the frontier ethic, saving endangered animal species may be considered foolish because new species will take their place animals serve no human purpose animals cannot be controlled extinctions occur as a natural process

new species will take their place

Explanation:

Frontier ethics is a set of ideologies that state that growth in the industrial sector must outweigh the costs of environmental impact, that is, it does not matter if nature is being degraded as long as the corporate sector is growing. Followers of these ideologies show little concern for environmental impact because they believe that all nature's resources are renewable and that nature will "fix" all the impact of large corporations on its own.

Frontier ethics believes that all that is degraded from nature is replaced by nature itself, so according to this philosophy saving endangered animal species can be considered foolish because new species will take their place.

i think that the best answer would be c.

tell me if im wrong : )

they dont have any evidence