The human genome project identified the sequence of base pairs in human dna and identified several genes. which question would least likely lead to a scientific investigation based on these findings? are certain humans more likely to develop genetic diseases? how can dna be used to identify criminals? can drugs be developed to target certain genes? should there be laws to protect dna information

The correct answer is- Should there be laws to protect DNA information

Explanation:

The goal of the human genome project was to identify all the base pair sequences present in the human genome and all the genes present in the human chromosome.

So after the completion of the human genome project, many more than 1800 disease genes have been identified. So the human genome project is helpful in the investigation of genetic disease and their treatment.

Scientific investigation does not have any role in making laws related to the protection of DNA information. Only the government of a country has the power to make law on any issue like this.  

Therefore, the correct answer is should there be laws to protect DNA information.

it has one origin of replication, but it proceeds in two directions - d)

i'm gonna put a couple so you can chose from

explanation:

if you know the fur color of the offspring mice, you can use the ratios to identify the genotypes of the parents.

if either parent mouse passes a dominant allele, the offspring will have black fur.

if the parental mice has two different fur color (i.e white and black) , the color of the offspring's fur would be either black, white, or the combination of both (grey)

hope this : )