You successfully clone an organism and are excited to publish your feat in Nature. However, a skeptical reviewer is not convinced because your donor cell could have been a stem cell, therefore undifferentiated and more amenable to somatic cell nuclear transfer. Furthermore, given the inefficiency of the process, the reviewer questions whether you may have produced a parthenote, not a clone. What data do you show the reviewer to convince them that your donor cell was fully specialized and that its genes directed the development of the new organism
Answers: 1
Biology, 22.06.2019 04:00
The tubes transporting minerals and water upward are called ?
Answers: 1
Biology, 22.06.2019 19:00
asap plz when a charge is dropped from a felony to a misdemeanor, which type of plea bargain has happened? ? a. vertical b. horizontal c. avoidance of stigma d. reduced sentence
Answers: 3
You successfully clone an organism and are excited to publish your feat in Nature. However, a skepti...
English, 31.07.2019 19:50
English, 31.07.2019 19:50
History, 31.07.2019 19:50
History, 31.07.2019 19:50
Mathematics, 31.07.2019 19:50
History, 31.07.2019 19:50
Geography, 31.07.2019 19:50
Computers and Technology, 31.07.2019 19:50