Before getting started on your concept map, use the activity below to organize your thoughts. Circle the correct option for each statement. OXIDATIVE PHOSPHORYLATION:A metabolic pathway that (OXIDIZES or REDUCES) an energy-rich source to produce ATP. The energy rich source for our cells is glucose, and (ELECTRONS OR PROTONS) are stripped from glucose as it travels through glycolysis and the TCA cycle. Electrons are transferred from electron (DONORS OR ACCEPTORS) to electron (DONORS OR ACCEPTORS).The final electron acceptor is a compound that has a (STRONGER OR WEAKER) reduction potential compared to that of the original electron donor. In aerobic respiration the final electron acceptor is (OXYGEN OR NOT OXYGEN), for anaerobic respiration the final electron acceptor is (OXYGEN OR NOT OXYGEN).As the electrons move through the ETC, energy in the electron is used to pump (ELECTRONS OR PROTONS) across the membrane. The movement of (ELECTRONS OR

Before getting started on your concept map, use the activity below to organize your thoughts. Circle the correct option for each statement. OXIDATIVE PHOSPHORYLATION:A metabolic pathway that (OXIDIZES or REDUCES) an energy-rich source to produce ATP.The energy rich source for our cells is glucose, and (ELECTRONS OR PROTONS) are stripped from glucose as it travels through glycolysis and the TCA cycle.Electrons are transferred from electron (DONORS OR ACCEPTORS) to electron (DONORS OR ACCEPTORS).The final electron acceptor is a compound that has a (STRONGER OR WEAKER) reduction potential compared to that of the original electron donor.In aerobic respiration the final electron acceptor is (OXYGEN OR NOT OXYGEN), for anaerobic respiration the final electron acceptor is (OXYGEN OR NOT OXYGEN).As the electrons move through the ETC, energy in the electron is used to pump (ELECTRONS OR PROTONS) across the membrane.The movement of (ELECTRONS OR

Explanation:

one would be wind another would be water density

"1. it should be, it has been for about 20 years, and it's really not much different in the end than breeding animals to have particular traits. there are always concerns about genetically engineered animals/plants affecting the environment in unexpected negative ways, but i can't think of an example where the fears didn't turn out to be baseless.  

first, as you point out, it would be a great advance in pharmacology, to be able to tailor drugs and their doses to me. the pros involve better medical treatment. the cons involve privacy issues like insurance companies denying coverage to people with genetic risk factors. looking at dna markers wouldn't affect the frequency of genetic diseases, but it would allow detection of them earlier. and ok, actually i suppose that if people used this information to avoid having children with genetic diseases, some might decrease in frequency."