3. Which solution would be better to implement? Justify your answer.

The Other Parts Of This Question

Explanation:

You Can't Expect To Answer Your Question If There Is No Proper Question

Better solutions that could be better is by encouraging populations of this problem and by encouraging this with a community program of pros and cons to this factor of life in the sea. If the community can encourage this problem to be solved, like the problems with trees being cut down. Then I can create a community that helps reduce the levels of pollution and acids that the ocean takes in. So that this can save many reefs and the species that live within the reefs. (This would be a better implementation for me to solve this problem.)

Explanation:

I don't think that there is a right answer. If there is then good for you! This is my answer for the question in my mind. This is also the answer I gave to my teacher on Edu. (I hope this gives an idea for something)

I agree with the person above!

it has to be understood that the sea water contains a huge amount of sodium and chlorine ions and if they enter the cell of the atlantic cod fish, the cell will shrivel and the fish will die. to avoid such a condition, the fish uses active transport for the purpose of removing the ions against the gradient.

explanation:

the atlantic cod is not a maritime osmoconformer. its native application of salts is less than that of the seawater it lives in. it is continually falling water from the gills to the ocean via osmosis.

countering that, the fish is going to be swallowing seawater. but since its internal collection of salts is lower than seawater, the fish will want to go free of excess salt, and since that's going upon a gradient, then active transport, requiring energy, must be used to pump out the salt. much marine fish use the organs to filter out the salt and these fish discharge very straight urine.