Isabella works for an environmental safety group. her group wants to answer the question "to what lengths must we go to protect plants and animals? " why is her group's research question flawed?
a)they will never be able to determine a means of protecting plants and animals.
b)the question is based on their bias as members of an environmental group.
c)the study can only be based on observation with this question.
d)they are trying to answer an ethical question, not a scientific one

D)They are trying to answer an ethical question, not a scientific one

The correct answer is option D

They are trying to answer the question that is ethical and has no fact in it. There is no extent upto which a person can go to save plants and animals. There is no scientific answer to this question and the environmental safety group. There is no answer to the ethical questions.

yes? sounds right, but you didn’t ask a question.

answer: i cant find your answer. do u have another way i can answer it for you : )

explanation: